AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Fiona T. Powers

Appears inactive Last observed office action: August 2012 (164 months ago).

Examiner Fiona T. Powers appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 67.1%, they average 1.85 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §112 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.85
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
5 years (2008-2012)
Tech Center
1600 - Biotechnology and Organic
Group
1620 - Biomedicinal Chemistry

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
283
Granted Applications
190
Non-Granted Applications
93
Avg OA / Grant
1.85
Last OA Observed
August 2012 (164 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1626
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 67.1% 1.85
Art Unit 30 60.6% 1.65
Group 248 48.3% 1.76
Tech Center 1,349 39.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 53 31 58.5%
2009 82 50 61.0%
2010 60 46 76.7%
2011 67 46 68.7%
2012 21 17 81.0%
No observed data after 2012; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

190 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 283 1.8% 21.6% 28.3% 33.9%
2 143 0.7% 12.6% 23.8% 56.6%
3 54 0.0% 22.2% 16.7% 53.7%
4 20 0.0% 15.0% 25.0% 55.0%
5 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 20.0%
6 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2008
1.3%
2009
1.7%
2010
1.8%
2011
0.0%
2012

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.