AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Daniel C Gamett. Ph.D

Examiner Daniel C Gamett. Ph.D appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 65.0%, they average 1.73 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §103 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.73
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
20 years (2007-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-1853
Predicted Supervisor
Joanne Hama
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-2911
Tech Center
1600 - Biotechnology and Organic
Group
1640 - Immunology

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
944
Granted Applications
614
Non-Granted Applications
330
Avg OA / Grant
1.73
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (1 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1647
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 65.0% 1.73
Art Unit 36 42.6% 1.60
Group 223 44.8% 1.94
Tech Center 1,349 39.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
2007 5 5 100.0%
2008 42 28 66.7%
2009 57 25 43.9%
2010 57 26 45.6%
2011 53 37 69.8%
2012 60 41 68.3%
2013 47 27 57.4%
2014 57 39 68.4%
2015 56 35 62.5%
2016 59 41 69.5%
2017 60 40 66.7%
2018 61 43 70.5%
2019 61 49 80.3%
2020 48 35 72.9%
2021 38 29 76.3%
2022 41 35 85.4%
2023 48 35 72.9%
2024 44 33 75.0%
2025 44 11 25.0%
2026 6 0 0.0%

614 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 938 2.7% 15.0% 34.3% 26.7%
2 414 3.6% 16.2% 36.0% 28.3%
3 134 3.0% 14.2% 39.6% 29.9%
4 62 1.6% 12.9% 43.5% 27.4%
5 35 0.0% 14.3% 51.4% 25.7%
6 23 0.0% 13.0% 43.5% 34.8%
7 10 0.0% 10.0% 40.0% 40.0%
8 8 0.0% 0.0% 62.5% 25.0%
9 7 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 28.6%
10 6 0.0% 16.7% 50.0% 33.3%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2007
4.3%
2008
1.5%
2009
1.6%
2010
0.0%
2011
4.2%
2012
3.4%
2013
2.0%
2014
2.9%
2015
1.8%
2016
1.9%
2017
5.2%
2018
3.4%
2019
4.5%
2020
1.8%
2021
5.2%
2022
1.5%
2023
1.7%
2024
3.9%
2025
16.7%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.