AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Ian Dang

Appears inactive Last observed office action: September 2013 (150 months ago).

Examiner Ian Dang appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 52.8%, they average 2.13 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §112 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.13
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2007-2013)
Tech Center
1600 - Biotechnology and Organic
Group
1640 - Immunology

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
233
Granted Applications
123
Non-Granted Applications
110
Avg OA / Grant
2.13
Last OA Observed
September 2013 (150 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1647
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 52.8% 2.13
Art Unit 36 42.6% 1.60
Group 223 44.8% 1.94
Tech Center 1,349 39.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
2007 6 4 66.7%
2008 46 16 34.8%
2009 44 23 52.3%
2010 29 19 65.5%
2011 40 21 52.5%
2012 43 24 55.8%
2013 25 16 64.0%
No observed data after 2013; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

123 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 233 1.3% 16.7% 42.1% 32.6%
2 141 2.8% 5.7% 31.9% 46.8%
3 60 3.3% 6.7% 28.3% 45.0%
4 23 0.0% 0.0% 30.4% 60.9%
5 7 0.0% 14.3% 57.1% 28.6%
6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2007
0.0%
2008
1.1%
2009
1.2%
2010
3.5%
2011
4.3%
2012
3.3%
2013

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.