AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Herbert J. Lilling

Appears inactive Last observed office action: August 2012 (163 months ago).

Examiner Herbert J. Lilling appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 78.9%, they average 1.36 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.36
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
5 years (2008-2012)
Tech Center
1600 - Biotechnology and Organic
Group
1650 - Enzymology, Microbiology, and Fermentation

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
237
Granted Applications
187
Non-Granted Applications
50
Avg OA / Grant
1.36
Last OA Observed
August 2012 (163 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1657
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 78.9% 1.36
Art Unit 35 47.1% 2.07
Group 207 41.1% 2.01
Tech Center 1,349 39.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 51 42 82.4%
2009 61 44 72.1%
2010 54 45 83.3%
2011 61 47 77.0%
2012 10 9 90.0%
No observed data after 2012; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

187 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 237 1.3% 4.6% 55.3% 22.8%
2 56 0.0% 5.4% 57.1% 30.4%
3 14 0.0% 7.1% 57.1% 35.7%
4 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%
5 2 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
1.4%
2010
2.7%
2011
0.0%
2012

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.