AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Examiner Dong Jiang

Examiner Examiner Dong Jiang appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 41.0%, they average 2.18 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §103 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.18
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-0872
Predicted Supervisor
Vanessa L Ford
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-0857
Tech Center
1600 - Biotechnology and Organic
Group
1640 - Immunology

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
652
Granted Applications
267
Non-Granted Applications
385
Avg OA / Grant
2.18
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1646 , 1674
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 41.0% 2.18
Art Unit 21 45.4% 1.89
Group 223 44.8% 1.94
Tech Center 1,349 39.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 26 13 50.0%
2009 20 9 45.0%
2010 23 4 17.4%
2011 29 13 44.8%
2012 47 23 48.9%
2013 38 14 36.8%
2014 45 15 33.3%
2015 37 13 35.1%
2016 55 24 43.6%
2017 43 20 46.5%
2018 37 20 54.1%
2019 32 17 53.1%
2020 36 20 55.6%
2021 35 19 54.3%
2022 31 10 32.3%
2023 25 9 36.0%
2024 37 20 54.1%
2025 41 4 9.8%
2026 15 0 0.0%

267 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 650 0.6% 15.4% 42.3% 30.9%
2 392 1.0% 11.0% 46.9% 28.1%
3 217 0.0% 12.4% 51.2% 24.9%
4 147 0.7% 13.6% 52.4% 22.4%
5 83 2.4% 9.6% 61.4% 18.1%
6 50 4.0% 4.0% 72.0% 8.0%
7 33 3.0% 6.1% 66.7% 9.1%
8 18 0.0% 5.6% 61.1% 5.6%
9 11 0.0% 18.2% 63.6% 9.1%
10 9 0.0% 11.1% 55.6% 11.1%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
2.4%
2008
0.0%
2009
2.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.8%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
1.6%
2016
1.8%
2017
1.0%
2018
1.1%
2019
2.2%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
1.2%
2023
0.0%
2024
2.9%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.