AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Robert J Kallal

Examiner Robert J Kallal appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 32.5%, they average 2.54 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and meaningful §101 activity.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.54
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
5 years (2022-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-6252
Predicted Supervisor
Olivia M. Wise
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-2249
Tech Center
1600 - Biotechnology and Organic
Group
1680 - Nucleic Acid Assay and Combinatorial / Computational Chemistry

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
126
Granted Applications
41
Non-Granted Applications
85
Avg OA / Grant
2.54
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1671 , 1685
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 32.5% 2.54
Art Unit 14 8.6% 2.77
Group 61 8.1% 2.37
Tech Center 1,349 39.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2022; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2022 2 1 50.0%
2023 29 14 48.3%
2024 31 20 64.5%
2025 44 6 13.6%
2026 20 0 0.0%

41 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 115 18.3% 3.5% 60.0% 0.9%
2 70 20.0% 2.9% 64.3% 4.3%
3 50 28.0% 2.0% 52.0% 12.0%
4 30 26.7% 3.3% 53.3% 10.0%
5 13 61.5% 0.0% 23.1% 7.7%
6 5 40.0% 0.0% 20.0% 20.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2022
24.2%
2023
18.9%
2024
27.5%
2025
40.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.