AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Amanda Heyes

Appears inactive Last observed office action: February 2017 (112 months ago).

Examiner Amanda Heyes appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 47.8%, they average 2.42 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.42
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
4 years (2014-2017)
Tech Center
1600 - Biotechnology and Organic
Group
1610 - Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Compositions

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
69
Granted Applications
33
Non-Granted Applications
36
Avg OA / Grant
2.42
Last OA Observed
February 2017 (112 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1612
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 47.8% 2.42
Art Unit 33 32.8% 2.35
Group 213 32.3% 2.42
Tech Center 1,349 39.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014 2015 2016 2017
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2014; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2014 5 1 20.0%
2015 28 12 42.9%
2016 35 19 54.3%
2017 1 1 100.0%
No observed data after 2017; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

33 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 69 2.9% 1.4% 75.4% 1.4%
2 46 2.2% 2.2% 84.8% 0.0%
3 19 0.0% 0.0% 89.5% 5.3%
4 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
0.0%
2013
11.8%
2014
1.3%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.