AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Cristi J Tate-Sims

Examiner Cristi J Tate-Sims appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 77.3%, they average 1.52 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.52
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
12 years (2015-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-1722
Predicted Supervisor
Michael Barr
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-1414
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1710 - Coating, Etching, Cleaning, Single Crystal Growth

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
731
Granted Applications
565
Non-Granted Applications
166
Avg OA / Grant
1.52
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1711
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 77.3% 1.52
Art Unit 26 59.2% 1.88
Group 154 50.2% 2.19
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2015; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2015 31 20 64.5%
2016 63 47 74.6%
2017 57 44 77.2%
2018 61 51 83.6%
2019 78 65 83.3%
2020 71 50 70.4%
2021 67 63 94.0%
2022 67 59 88.1%
2023 78 72 92.3%
2024 64 53 82.8%
2025 78 41 52.6%
2026 16 0 0.0%

565 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 728 0.1% 3.8% 92.7% 1.5%
2 257 0.0% 3.5% 91.4% 3.9%
3 70 0.0% 0.0% 92.9% 2.9%
4 23 0.0% 4.3% 91.3% 4.3%
5 11 0.0% 0.0% 81.8% 9.1%
6 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
1.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.