AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Thomas Pham

Examiner Thomas Pham appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 44.5%, they average 3.06 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.06
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
16 years (2011-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-7670
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1710 - Coating, Etching, Cleaning, Single Crystal Growth

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
634
Granted Applications
282
Non-Granted Applications
352
Avg OA / Grant
3.06
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1713
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 44.5% 3.06
Art Unit 20 61.2% 1.92
Group 154 50.2% 2.19
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2011; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2011 13 6 46.2%
2012 30 7 23.3%
2013 42 15 35.7%
2014 33 15 45.5%
2015 45 22 48.9%
2016 39 17 43.6%
2017 36 15 41.7%
2018 37 24 64.9%
2019 52 28 53.8%
2020 42 24 57.1%
2021 43 33 76.7%
2022 43 24 55.8%
2023 42 25 59.5%
2024 32 16 50.0%
2025 65 11 16.9%
2026 40 0 0.0%

282 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 634 0.0% 3.9% 89.9% 5.5%
2 494 0.0% 2.4% 83.6% 12.6%
3 323 0.0% 2.8% 82.4% 14.6%
4 242 0.0% 0.8% 79.8% 19.4%
5 127 0.0% 2.4% 78.0% 19.7%
6 80 0.0% 0.0% 82.5% 17.5%
7 47 0.0% 0.0% 76.6% 21.3%
8 36 0.0% 0.0% 86.1% 13.9%
9 16 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
10 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%