AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Miriam Berdichevsky

Examiner Miriam Berdichevsky appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 34.1%, they average 2.57 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.57
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-5256
Predicted Supervisor
Srilakshmi Kumar
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-7769
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1720 - Fuel Cells, Batteries, Solar Cells, Liquid Crystal Composition

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
320
Granted Applications
109
Non-Granted Applications
211
Avg OA / Grant
2.57
Last OA Observed
January 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1723 , 1724 , 1754 , 1758 , 1795
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 34.1% 2.57
Art Unit 44 40.4% 1.85
Group 253 48.9% 2.20
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2019 2020 2021 2023 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 31 13 41.9%
2009 43 17 39.5%
2010 45 19 42.2%
2011 50 26 52.0%
2012 54 11 20.4%
2013 54 13 24.1%
2014 10 1 10.0%
2015 1 1 100.0%
2016 6 1 16.7%
2017 5 1 20.0%
No observed data for 2018.
2019 1 1 100.0%
2020 1 0 0.0%
2021 2 0 0.0%
No observed data for 2022.
2023 8 4 50.0%
No observed data for 2024.
2025 8 1 12.5%
2026 1 0 0.0%

109 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 304 0.0% 5.6% 82.2% 0.3%
2 227 0.0% 5.7% 83.7% 3.5%
3 122 0.0% 2.5% 86.9% 1.6%
4 81 0.0% 2.5% 84.0% 4.9%
5 42 0.0% 4.8% 78.6% 2.4%
6 23 0.0% 0.0% 78.3% 4.3%
7 11 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 0.0%
8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%