AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Kevin M. Johnson

Appears inactive Last observed office action: December 2011 (172 months ago).

Examiner Kevin M. Johnson appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 52.1%, they average 2.41 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.41
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
5 years (2007-2011)
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1790 - Food, Analytical Chemistry, Sterilization, Biochemistry, Electrochemistry

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
140
Granted Applications
73
Non-Granted Applications
67
Avg OA / Grant
2.41
Last OA Observed
December 2011 (172 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1732 , 1793
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 52.1% 2.41
Art Unit 30 32.2% 2.59
Group 307 37.1% 2.11
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
2007 1 1 100.0%
2008 33 14 42.4%
2009 45 20 44.4%
2010 36 23 63.9%
2011 25 15 60.0%
No observed data after 2011; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

73 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 140 0.7% 6.4% 76.4% 1.4%
2 92 1.1% 5.4% 84.8% 4.3%
3 45 0.0% 2.2% 91.1% 2.2%
4 20 0.0% 5.0% 80.0% 15.0%
5 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 3 0.0% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2007
1.1%
2008
0.0%
2009
1.5%
2010
0.0%
2011

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.