Examiner Brittany M. Martinez
Examiner Brittany M. Martinez appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 40.5%, they average 2.02 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.
Difficulty vs AU
Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group
Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC
About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO
Very Hard
Average OA / Grant
2.02
Export
Word
PDF
Create account to export.
Examiner Details
- Observed Examiner Years
- 6 years (2007-2012)
- Tech Center
- 1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
- Group
- 1790 - Food, Analytical Chemistry, Sterilization, Biochemistry, Electrochemistry
Metrics
- Applications Evaluated
- 163
- Granted Applications
- 66
- Non-Granted Applications
- 97
- Avg OA / Grant
- 2.02
- Last OA Observed
- October 2012 (162 months ago)
Context Comparison
| Scope | Examiners | Lifetime Grant Ratio | Avg OA / Grant |
|---|---|---|---|
| This Examiner | 1 | 40.5% | 2.02 |
| Art Unit | 30 | 32.2% | 2.59 |
| Group | 307 | 37.1% | 2.11 |
| Tech Center | 1,713 | 47.3% | 2.14 |
| USPTO | 16,116 | 54.8% | 1.98 |
Grant Timeline
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
| Year | Applications | Granted | Grant Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| 2008 | 47 | 24 | 51.1% |
| 2009 | 51 | 26 | 51.0% |
| 2010 | 26 | 7 | 26.9% |
| 2011 | 27 | 6 | 22.2% |
| 2012 | 10 | 2 | 20.0% |
| No observed data after 2012; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work. | |||
66 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.
Rejection Timeline
| OA # | Office Actions | § 101 Percentage | § 102 Percentage | § 103 Percentage | § 112 Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 163 | 0.6% | 1.8% | 68.7% | 1.2% |
| 2 | 85 | 0.0% | 2.4% | 75.3% | 3.5% |
| 3 | 32 | 0.0% | 3.1% | 78.1% | 0.0% |
| 4 | 16 | 0.0% | 6.3% | 68.8% | 6.3% |
| 5 | 8 | 0.0% | 25.0% | 75.0% | 0.0% |
| 6 | 3 | 0.0% | 33.3% | 66.7% | 0.0% |
§ 101 Yearly Trend
Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.