AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Cynthia L Schaller

Examiner Cynthia L Schaller appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 63.8%, they average 1.87 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.87
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
11 years (2016-2026)
Phone
(408) 918-7619
Predicted Supervisor
Michael Orlando
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-5038
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1740 - Tires, Adhesive Bonding, Glass/Paper Making, Plastics Shaping and Molding

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
459
Granted Applications
293
Non-Granted Applications
166
Avg OA / Grant
1.87
Last OA Observed
May 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1745 , 1746
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 63.8% 1.87
Art Unit 24 52.7% 2.01
Group 203 51.1% 2.05
Tech Center 1,762 45.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,347 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2016; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2016 2 0 0.0%
2017 27 11 40.7%
2018 45 32 71.1%
2019 41 26 63.4%
2020 62 43 69.4%
2021 43 31 72.1%
2022 52 39 75.0%
2023 55 42 76.4%
2024 63 46 73.0%
2025 54 23 42.6%
2026 15 0 0.0%

293 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 457 0.2% 4.4% 74.2% 14.2%
2 225 0.0% 3.1% 80.9% 9.8%
3 95 0.0% 1.1% 85.3% 8.4%
4 61 0.0% 0.0% 88.5% 6.6%
5 24 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 4.2%
6 13 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 7.7%
7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.9%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.