AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Gabriel Gitman

Examiner Gabriel Gitman appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 68.5%, they average 1.55 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.55
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
10 years (2017-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-7934
Predicted Supervisor
In Suk Bullock
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-3471
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1770 - Chemical Apparatus, Separation and Purification

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
480
Granted Applications
329
Non-Granted Applications
151
Avg OA / Grant
1.55
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1772
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 68.5% 1.55
Art Unit 22 57.3% 1.77
Group 173 53.1% 1.94
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2017; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2017 3 2 66.7%
2018 34 23 67.6%
2019 55 38 69.1%
2020 63 49 77.8%
2021 69 54 78.3%
2022 55 46 83.6%
2023 71 55 77.5%
2024 49 33 67.3%
2025 68 29 42.6%
2026 13 0 0.0%

329 family-cache-validated grants; 1 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 483 0.2% 1.9% 48.4% 40.0%
2 174 1.1% 0.6% 64.9% 25.9%
3 64 0.0% 1.6% 76.6% 17.2%
4 31 0.0% 0.0% 90.3% 6.5%
5 14 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
6 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
7 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
1.4%
2024
2.3%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.