AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Saeeda Latham

Appears inactive Last observed office action: April 2016 (119 months ago).

Examiner Saeeda Latham appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 14.6%, they average 3.15 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.15
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
8 years (2009-2016)
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1790 - Food, Analytical Chemistry, Sterilization, Biochemistry, Electrochemistry

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
137
Granted Applications
20
Non-Granted Applications
117
Avg OA / Grant
3.15
Last OA Observed
April 2016 (119 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1782 , 1789 , 1793 , 1794
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 14.6% 3.15
Art Unit 30 32.2% 2.59
Group 307 37.1% 2.11
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2009; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2009 18 1 5.6%
2010 31 8 25.8%
2011 19 3 15.8%
2012 16 0 0.0%
2013 22 5 22.7%
2014 13 2 15.4%
2015 12 0 0.0%
2016 6 1 16.7%
No observed data after 2016; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

20 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 137 0.7% 4.4% 84.7% 0.0%
2 92 0.0% 5.4% 83.7% 0.0%
3 52 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 0.0%
4 36 0.0% 0.0% 86.1% 2.8%
5 23 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 10 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 10.0%
7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
0.0%
2008
2.2%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.