AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Marla D. Mcconnell

Examiner Marla D. Mcconnell appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 28.5%, they average 2.76 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.76
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
16 years (2011-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-7692
Predicted Supervisor
Director Greg Tryder
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-7365
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1750 - 1750

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
239
Granted Applications
68
Non-Granted Applications
171
Avg OA / Grant
2.76
Last OA Observed
January 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1728 , 1758 , 1789
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 28.5% 2.76
Art Unit 19 26.1% 1.83
Group 94 34.8% 1.92
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2011; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2011 35 10 28.6%
2012 39 8 20.5%
2013 37 9 24.3%
2014 49 10 20.4%
2015 39 15 38.5%
2016 21 11 52.4%
2017 3 0 0.0%
2018 4 0 0.0%
2019 6 4 66.7%
No observed data for 2020-2024.
2025 5 1 20.0%
2026 1 0 0.0%

68 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 226 0.0% 2.7% 89.8% 1.3%
2 157 0.6% 3.2% 86.0% 3.8%
3 80 0.0% 10.0% 83.8% 1.3%
4 51 0.0% 5.9% 84.3% 3.9%
5 14 0.0% 0.0% 92.9% 0.0%
6 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 11.1%
7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
1.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.