AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Larissa Rowe Emrich

Examiner Larissa Rowe Emrich appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 35.9%, they average 3.12 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.12
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
11 years (2016-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2506
Predicted Supervisor
Marla Mcconnell
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-7692
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1780 - Miscellaneous Articles, Stock Material, Adhesive Composition, Fabrics

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
357
Granted Applications
128
Non-Granted Applications
229
Avg OA / Grant
3.12
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1789
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 35.9% 3.12
Art Unit 23 25.0% 3.00
Group 186 42.4% 2.73
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2016; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2016 10 0 0.0%
2017 15 0 0.0%
2018 27 7 25.9%
2019 36 16 44.4%
2020 39 25 64.1%
2021 35 14 40.0%
2022 35 19 54.3%
2023 35 21 60.0%
2024 33 21 63.6%
2025 61 5 8.2%
2026 31 0 0.0%

128 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 333 0.9% 2.4% 83.8% 1.2%
2 253 2.0% 8.7% 34.0% 51.0%
3 154 0.0% 3.9% 51.9% 38.3%
4 117 0.0% 3.4% 53.8% 38.5%
5 47 0.0% 2.1% 57.4% 36.2%
6 23 0.0% 8.7% 52.2% 39.1%
7 14 0.0% 7.1% 64.3% 28.6%
8 7 0.0% 14.3% 57.1% 28.6%
9 2 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2016
1.1%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
1.8%
2021
1.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
3.4%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.