AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Bernard Lipman

Appears inactive Last observed office action: September 2011 (175 months ago).

Examiner Bernard Lipman appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 84.7%, they average 1.27 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.27
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
4 years (2008-2011)
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1790 - Food, Analytical Chemistry, Sterilization, Biochemistry, Electrochemistry

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
209
Granted Applications
177
Non-Granted Applications
32
Avg OA / Grant
1.27
Last OA Observed
September 2011 (175 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1762 , 1796
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 84.7% 1.27
Art Unit 29 38.7% 1.84
Group 307 37.1% 2.11
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 67 58 86.6%
2009 54 42 77.8%
2010 68 60 88.2%
2011 20 17 85.0%
No observed data after 2011; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

177 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 209 2.4% 8.1% 63.6% 12.4%
2 39 0.0% 7.7% 69.2% 7.7%
3 9 0.0% 0.0% 77.8% 0.0%
4 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2007
1.1%
2008
2.8%
2009
2.5%
2010
0.0%
2011

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.