AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Sarah A. Slifka

Examiner Sarah A. Slifka appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 71.3%, they average 1.76 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.76
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-5838
Predicted Supervisor
Curtis Mayes
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-1234
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1720 - Fuel Cells, Batteries, Solar Cells, Liquid Crystal Composition

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
679
Granted Applications
484
Non-Granted Applications
195
Avg OA / Grant
1.76
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1724 , 1734 , 1759 , 1793 , 1796
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 71.3% 1.76
Art Unit 24 55.4% 2.04
Group 253 48.9% 2.20
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 10 4 40.0%
2009 46 29 63.0%
2010 35 10 28.6%
2011 32 15 46.9%
2012 43 24 55.8%
2013 47 27 57.4%
2014 58 41 70.7%
2015 43 34 79.1%
2016 55 49 89.1%
2017 27 25 92.6%
2018 41 34 82.9%
2019 41 35 85.4%
2020 30 28 93.3%
2021 31 27 87.1%
2022 26 24 92.3%
2023 32 27 84.4%
2024 30 25 83.3%
2025 42 26 61.9%
2026 10 0 0.0%

484 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 674 1.0% 6.4% 88.0% 2.8%
2 301 0.3% 2.7% 94.0% 2.7%
3 126 0.0% 4.0% 93.7% 2.4%
4 71 0.0% 2.8% 93.0% 2.8%
5 23 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2007
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
1.3%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
5.6%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
2.8%
2023
12.9%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.