AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Nathan G Esperon

Examiner Nathan G Esperon appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 28.0%, they average 3.13 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.13
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2020-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-9807
Predicted Supervisor
Michael Marcheschi
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-1374
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1790 - Food, Analytical Chemistry, Sterilization, Biochemistry, Electrochemistry

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
143
Granted Applications
40
Non-Granted Applications
103
Avg OA / Grant
3.13
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1799
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 28.0% 3.13
Art Unit 25 41.7% 2.27
Group 307 37.1% 2.11
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2020; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2020 3 0 0.0%
2021 14 3 21.4%
2022 22 6 27.3%
2023 28 14 50.0%
2024 24 11 45.8%
2025 30 6 20.0%
2026 22 0 0.0%

40 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 144 0.0% 0.7% 84.0% 0.7%
2 116 0.9% 2.6% 79.3% 6.9%
3 70 0.0% 1.4% 75.7% 14.3%
4 33 3.0% 3.0% 78.8% 6.1%
5 20 5.0% 0.0% 75.0% 15.0%
6 10 10.0% 0.0% 70.0% 10.0%
7 7 14.3% 0.0% 42.9% 14.3%
8 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
1.3%
2022
2.3%
2023
1.6%
2024
1.4%
2025
4.5%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.