AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Tae-Sik Kang

Examiner Tae-Sik Kang appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 52.2%, they average 2.26 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.26
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
15 years (2012-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-3190
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1720 - Fuel Cells, Batteries, Solar Cells, Liquid Crystal Composition

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
575
Granted Applications
300
Non-Granted Applications
275
Avg OA / Grant
2.26
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1726 , 1728 , 1757
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 52.2% 2.26
Art Unit 32 43.7% 2.52
Group 253 48.9% 2.20
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2012; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2012 1 0 0.0%
2013 33 6 18.2%
2014 42 13 31.0%
2015 42 14 33.3%
2016 30 6 20.0%
2017 51 26 51.0%
2018 31 22 71.0%
2019 44 23 52.3%
2020 31 18 58.1%
2021 43 31 72.1%
2022 47 40 85.1%
2023 55 45 81.8%
2024 52 34 65.4%
2025 52 22 42.3%
2026 21 0 0.0%

300 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 562 0.0% 10.0% 77.2% 11.9%
2 315 1.0% 12.7% 77.8% 7.6%
3 195 0.0% 7.2% 81.5% 10.3%
4 126 0.8% 3.2% 79.4% 16.7%
5 68 0.0% 4.4% 80.9% 14.7%
6 43 0.0% 2.3% 76.7% 20.9%
7 27 0.0% 3.7% 81.5% 14.8%
8 18 0.0% 5.6% 94.4% 0.0%
9 14 0.0% 0.0% 78.6% 21.4%
10 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
1.6%
2019
1.1%
2020
1.2%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.