AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Vanessa T. Luk

Examiner Vanessa T. Luk appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 49.3%, they average 2.72 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.72
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-3587
Predicted Supervisor
Roy King
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-1244
Tech Center
1700 - Chemical and Materials Engineering
Group
1730 - Metallurgy, Inorganic Chemistry, Catalysts, Electrophotography, Photolithography

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
761
Granted Applications
375
Non-Granted Applications
386
Avg OA / Grant
2.72
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
1733 , 1793
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 49.3% 2.72
Art Unit 30 54.0% 2.02
Group 185 51.5% 1.97
Tech Center 1,713 47.3% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 32 8 25.0%
2009 38 13 34.2%
2010 45 16 35.6%
2011 43 18 41.9%
2012 40 24 60.0%
2013 46 24 52.2%
2014 47 26 55.3%
2015 39 21 53.8%
2016 43 28 65.1%
2017 41 27 65.9%
2018 47 24 51.1%
2019 52 27 51.9%
2020 52 31 59.6%
2021 41 20 48.8%
2022 23 22 95.7%
2023 34 20 58.8%
2024 21 15 71.4%
2025 49 11 22.4%
2026 28 0 0.0%

375 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 750 0.0% 2.0% 75.1% 6.1%
2 551 0.0% 1.5% 87.8% 5.6%
3 324 0.0% 0.3% 88.3% 5.9%
4 210 0.0% 1.0% 85.2% 10.5%
5 94 0.0% 0.0% 89.4% 8.5%
6 55 0.0% 0.0% 87.3% 12.7%
7 26 0.0% 3.8% 84.6% 11.5%
8 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%