AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Neil Miles

Appears inactive Last observed office action: August 2013 (151 months ago).

Examiner Neil Miles appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 83.2%, they average 1.54 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.54
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2007-2013)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2110 - Computer Error Control, Reliability, and Control Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
131
Granted Applications
109
Non-Granted Applications
22
Avg OA / Grant
1.54
Last OA Observed
August 2013 (151 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2113
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 83.2% 1.54
Art Unit 26 67.0% 1.70
Group 203 68.7% 1.68
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007 2010 2011 2012 2013
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
2007 2 2 100.0%
No observed data for 2008-2009.
2010 7 6 85.7%
2011 48 38 79.2%
2012 45 36 80.0%
2013 29 27 93.1%
No observed data after 2013; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

109 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 131 2.3% 13.0% 77.9% 3.1%
2 56 1.8% 10.7% 85.7% 1.8%
3 16 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
4 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2007
0.0%
2010
2.2%
2011
1.5%
2012
3.1%
2013

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.