AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Alicia M. Choi

Examiner Alicia M. Choi appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 67.9%, they average 1.76 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.76
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
9 years (2018-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-1473
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2110 - Computer Error Control, Reliability, and Control Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
368
Granted Applications
250
Non-Granted Applications
118
Avg OA / Grant
1.76
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2117 , 2125
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 67.9% 1.76
Art Unit 31 68.2% 1.86
Group 203 68.7% 1.68
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2018; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2018 21 15 71.4%
2019 31 21 67.7%
2020 42 29 69.0%
2021 35 21 60.0%
2022 50 40 80.0%
2023 55 49 89.1%
2024 55 45 81.8%
2025 61 30 49.2%
2026 18 0 0.0%

250 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 362 9.7% 4.7% 77.3% 5.8%
2 176 12.5% 3.4% 80.1% 2.8%
3 62 16.1% 0.0% 82.3% 1.6%
4 35 8.6% 0.0% 91.4% 0.0%
5 12 8.3% 0.0% 91.7% 0.0%
6 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
9.0%
2020
15.4%
2021
10.3%
2022
18.2%
2023
19.4%
2024
13.8%
2025
5.6%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.