AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Kevin L. Smith

Examiner Kevin L. Smith appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 24.6%, they average 3.50 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and meaningful §101 activity.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.50
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
8 years (2019-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-5964
Predicted Supervisor
Hyung S Sough
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-6799
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
179
Granted Applications
44
Non-Granted Applications
135
Avg OA / Grant
3.50
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2122
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 24.6% 3.50
Art Unit 34 40.2% 1.96
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2019; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2019 4 2 50.0%
2020 11 4 36.4%
2021 23 12 52.2%
2022 26 13 50.0%
2023 22 7 31.8%
2024 24 2 8.3%
2025 49 4 8.2%
2026 20 0 0.0%

44 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 174 4.6% 6.9% 86.2% 1.7%
2 131 25.2% 7.6% 61.8% 5.3%
3 102 28.4% 3.9% 61.8% 4.9%
4 84 26.2% 6.0% 59.5% 6.0%
5 43 20.9% 2.3% 72.1% 0.0%
6 28 25.0% 7.1% 67.9% 0.0%
7 12 66.7% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0%
8 7 42.9% 0.0% 57.1% 0.0%
9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2019
8.0%
2020
9.7%
2021
15.5%
2022
35.1%
2023
36.2%
2024
27.7%
2025
15.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.