AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Aniss Chad

Examiner Aniss Chad appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 68.1%, they average 2.11 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.11
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-3832
Predicted Supervisor
James Trammell
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-6712
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
432
Granted Applications
294
Non-Granted Applications
138
Avg OA / Grant
2.11
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2123 , 2129 , 3662
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 68.1% 2.11
Art Unit 47 48.6% 1.86
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 1 1 100.0%
2009 16 13 81.3%
2010 39 25 64.1%
2011 45 27 60.0%
2012 52 40 76.9%
2013 48 27 56.3%
2014 52 41 78.8%
2015 35 30 85.7%
2016 43 29 67.4%
2017 27 14 51.9%
2018 14 11 78.6%
2019 29 24 82.8%
2020 8 8 100.0%
2021 7 2 28.6%
No observed data for 2022-2024.
2025 11 2 18.2%
2026 5 0 0.0%

294 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 431 10.2% 12.1% 68.7% 8.1%
2 265 10.9% 9.4% 73.2% 4.5%
3 127 5.5% 6.3% 84.3% 2.4%
4 71 7.0% 4.2% 85.9% 2.8%
5 26 3.8% 7.7% 84.6% 0.0%
6 9 11.1% 0.0% 88.9% 0.0%
7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.9%
2010
4.8%
2011
9.3%
2012
4.5%
2013
1.9%
2014
9.0%
2015
12.0%
2016
29.4%
2017
41.7%
2018
15.1%
2019
12.5%
2020
0.0%
2021
21.4%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.