AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Sehwan Kim

Examiner Sehwan Kim appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 45.1%, they average 2.92 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.92
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
8 years (2019-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-7409
Predicted Supervisor
Michael Huntley
Supervisor Phone
(303) 297-4307
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
175
Granted Applications
79
Non-Granted Applications
96
Avg OA / Grant
2.92
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2123 , 2129
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 45.1% 2.92
Art Unit 33 58.4% 1.89
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2019; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2019 5 3 60.0%
2020 30 13 43.3%
2021 18 8 44.4%
2022 24 20 83.3%
2023 22 13 59.1%
2024 29 19 65.5%
2025 26 3 11.5%
2026 21 0 0.0%

79 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 169 2.4% 1.2% 88.2% 7.1%
2 127 3.9% 1.6% 92.1% 2.4%
3 84 6.0% 0.0% 89.3% 3.6%
4 61 9.8% 0.0% 85.2% 4.9%
5 26 7.7% 0.0% 88.5% 3.8%
6 15 6.7% 6.7% 80.0% 6.7%
7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
1.5%
2021
3.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
11.7%
2024
24.5%
2025
9.1%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.