AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Beatriz Ramirez Bravo

Examiner Beatriz Ramirez Bravo appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 49.1%, they average 3.27 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.27
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
8 years (2019-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2156
Predicted Supervisor
Andrew Jung
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-3779
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
114
Granted Applications
56
Non-Granted Applications
58
Avg OA / Grant
3.27
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2123 , 2146
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 49.1% 3.27
Art Unit 47 48.6% 1.86
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2019; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2019 10 7 70.0%
2020 11 4 36.4%
2021 14 11 78.6%
2022 13 9 69.2%
2023 19 14 73.7%
2024 17 8 47.1%
2025 23 3 13.0%
2026 7 0 0.0%

56 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 103 1.0% 1.9% 93.2% 3.9%
2 86 2.3% 0.0% 95.3% 2.3%
3 62 1.6% 0.0% 95.2% 3.2%
4 44 4.5% 0.0% 95.5% 0.0%
5 24 4.2% 0.0% 95.8% 0.0%
6 17 11.8% 0.0% 88.2% 0.0%
7 13 38.5% 0.0% 61.5% 0.0%
8 6 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
15.8%
2023
8.8%
2024
5.6%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.