AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner David H. Kim

Appears inactive Last observed office action: November 2016 (114 months ago).

Examiner David H. Kim appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 88.3%, they average 1.32 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.32
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
8 years (2009-2016)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
163
Granted Applications
144
Non-Granted Applications
19
Avg OA / Grant
1.32
Last OA Observed
November 2016 (114 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2124 , 2129
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 88.3% 1.32
Art Unit 33 58.4% 1.89
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2009; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2009 22 17 77.3%
2010 17 15 88.2%
2011 20 17 85.0%
2012 5 3 60.0%
2013 35 31 88.6%
2014 24 23 95.8%
2015 26 24 92.3%
2016 14 14 100.0%
No observed data after 2016; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

144 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 163 1.8% 20.9% 59.5% 0.6%
2 43 11.6% 20.9% 65.1% 0.0%
3 7 0.0% 28.6% 71.4% 0.0%
4 4 0.0% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0%
5 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
3.2%
2009
0.0%
2010
12.5%
2011
0.0%
2012
1.9%
2013
3.4%
2014
6.1%
2015
0.0%
2016

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.