AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Yao David Huang

Examiner Yao David Huang appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 49.3%, they average 2.69 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.69
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2020-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-1764
Predicted Supervisor
Miranda Huang
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-7092
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
144
Granted Applications
71
Non-Granted Applications
73
Avg OA / Grant
2.69
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2124
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 49.3% 2.69
Art Unit 30 60.1% 1.83
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2020; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2020 12 5 41.7%
2021 24 19 79.2%
2022 15 9 60.0%
2023 27 16 59.3%
2024 20 11 55.0%
2025 35 11 31.4%
2026 11 0 0.0%

71 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 137 3.6% 1.5% 90.5% 3.6%
2 97 2.1% 1.0% 96.9% 0.0%
3 66 0.0% 1.5% 97.0% 0.0%
4 41 2.4% 0.0% 97.6% 0.0%
5 23 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 19 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2019
3.5%
2020
1.5%
2021
0.0%
2022
4.1%
2023
3.2%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.