AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Van C Mang

Examiner Van C Mang appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 59.6%, they average 2.81 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.81
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
8 years (2019-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-7598
Predicted Supervisor
David Yi
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-7519
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
250
Granted Applications
149
Non-Granted Applications
101
Avg OA / Grant
2.81
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2125 , 2126
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 59.6% 2.81
Art Unit 29 34.9% 2.14
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2019; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2019 9 8 88.9%
2020 28 23 82.1%
2021 41 29 70.7%
2022 32 22 68.8%
2023 24 16 66.7%
2024 43 27 62.8%
2025 63 24 38.1%
2026 10 0 0.0%

149 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 212 4.2% 1.4% 91.0% 1.9%
2 166 17.5% 0.6% 80.1% 0.6%
3 112 20.5% 1.8% 75.9% 0.9%
4 72 23.6% 1.4% 73.6% 0.0%
5 38 28.9% 0.0% 68.4% 0.0%
6 18 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
7 6 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
8 5 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2019
1.0%
2020
2.8%
2021
1.4%
2022
9.7%
2023
31.9%
2024
44.1%
2025
40.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.