AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Charles C Kuo

Appears inactive Last observed office action: May 2025 (10 months ago).

Examiner Charles C Kuo appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 43.1%, they average 3.32 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.32
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2019-2025)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
102
Granted Applications
44
Non-Granted Applications
58
Avg OA / Grant
3.32
Last OA Observed
May 2025 (10 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2122 , 2126
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 43.1% 3.32
Art Unit 29 34.9% 2.14
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2019; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2019 7 3 42.9%
2020 16 6 37.5%
2021 11 7 63.6%
2022 19 9 47.4%
2023 14 6 42.9%
2024 22 8 36.4%
2025 13 5 38.5%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

44 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 101 0.0% 7.9% 92.1% 0.0%
2 91 0.0% 2.2% 97.8% 0.0%
3 68 0.0% 1.5% 97.1% 1.5%
4 52 1.9% 0.0% 98.1% 0.0%
5 24 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
1.6%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
5.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.