AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Kris Mackes

Examiner Kris Mackes appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 71.4%, they average 2.02 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.02
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-3554
Predicted Supervisor
Kavita Stanley
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-8352
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2150 - Databases and File Management

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
517
Granted Applications
369
Non-Granted Applications
148
Avg OA / Grant
2.02
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (1 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2153 , 2154 , 2164 , 2168
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 71.4% 2.02
Art Unit 13 71.3% 2.51
Group 120 60.4% 2.66
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 4 0 0.0%
2009 21 4 19.0%
2010 20 8 40.0%
2011 32 18 56.3%
2012 21 15 71.4%
2013 23 18 78.3%
2014 31 18 58.1%
2015 32 24 75.0%
2016 42 35 83.3%
2017 35 30 85.7%
2018 28 19 67.9%
2019 33 27 81.8%
2020 39 34 87.2%
2021 26 24 92.3%
2022 34 32 94.1%
2023 28 24 85.7%
2024 30 24 80.0%
2025 32 15 46.9%
2026 6 0 0.0%

369 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 515 5.4% 11.1% 69.3% 2.1%
2 276 2.2% 6.5% 87.0% 0.4%
3 153 0.7% 5.9% 91.5% 0.0%
4 107 0.9% 2.8% 93.5% 0.0%
5 58 0.0% 1.7% 96.6% 0.0%
6 27 0.0% 7.4% 92.6% 0.0%
7 15 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2007
0.0%
2008
1.1%
2009
1.5%
2010
1.3%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
1.4%
2015
1.4%
2016
3.5%
2017
5.1%
2018
1.5%
2019
4.9%
2020
9.1%
2021
8.9%
2022
14.9%
2023
7.5%
2024
2.6%
2025
33.3%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.