AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Rachel J. Lee

Appears inactive Last observed office action: October 2011 (174 months ago).

Examiner Rachel J. Lee appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 50.6%, they average 3.10 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.10
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
5 years (2007-2011)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2150 - Databases and File Management

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
79
Granted Applications
40
Non-Granted Applications
39
Avg OA / Grant
3.10
Last OA Observed
October 2011 (174 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2156 , 2169
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 50.6% 3.10
Art Unit 22 59.0% 2.62
Group 120 60.4% 2.66
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
2007 1 0 0.0%
2008 11 2 18.2%
2009 25 17 68.0%
2010 25 13 52.0%
2011 17 8 47.1%
No observed data after 2011; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

40 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 79 1.3% 12.7% 86.1% 0.0%
2 60 15.0% 6.7% 78.3% 0.0%
3 43 7.0% 7.0% 83.7% 2.3%
4 23 4.3% 0.0% 91.3% 4.3%
5 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2007
1.3%
2008
15.0%
2009
2.3%
2010
0.0%
2011

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.