AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Susan F. Rayyan

Appears inactive Last observed office action: May 2025 (10 months ago).

Examiner Susan F. Rayyan appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 79.1%, they average 2.07 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.07
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
18 years (2008-2025)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2160 - Databases and File Management

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
297
Granted Applications
235
Non-Granted Applications
62
Avg OA / Grant
2.07
Last OA Observed
May 2025 (10 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2167
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 79.1% 2.07
Art Unit 20 63.9% 2.40
Group 193 61.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 6 4 66.7%
2009 21 10 47.6%
2010 25 23 92.0%
2011 18 15 83.3%
2012 14 10 71.4%
2013 19 16 84.2%
2014 16 9 56.3%
2015 12 10 83.3%
2016 20 17 85.0%
2017 13 11 84.6%
2018 16 14 87.5%
2019 19 10 52.6%
2020 23 19 82.6%
2021 14 14 100.0%
2022 19 16 84.2%
2023 19 16 84.2%
2024 12 11 91.7%
2025 11 10 90.9%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

235 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 302 3.0% 16.6% 73.8% 1.0%
2 185 22.2% 7.0% 55.7% 11.4%
3 82 11.0% 6.1% 76.8% 1.2%
4 46 6.5% 6.5% 65.2% 17.4%
5 22 18.2% 9.1% 68.2% 4.5%
6 12 25.0% 8.3% 66.7% 0.0%
7 2 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%
8 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
11.5%
2008
4.7%
2009
11.4%
2010
7.7%
2011
2.2%
2012
10.0%
2013
8.3%
2014
8.8%
2015
14.3%
2016
14.6%
2017
26.8%
2018
15.8%
2019
11.9%
2020
4.2%
2021
2.8%
2022
7.1%
2023
15.4%
2024
18.8%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.