AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Brian Chew

Appears inactive Last observed office action: March 2014 (144 months ago).

Examiner Brian Chew appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 66.9%, they average 1.99 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 1.99
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
6 years (2009-2014)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2190 - Inter-process Communications and Software Development

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
127
Granted Applications
85
Non-Granted Applications
42
Avg OA / Grant
1.99
Last OA Observed
March 2014 (144 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2195
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 66.9% 1.99
Art Unit 34 56.8% 2.03
Group 221 57.3% 2.03
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2009; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2009 7 4 57.1%
2010 34 23 67.6%
2011 32 25 78.1%
2012 30 20 66.7%
2013 22 11 50.0%
2014 2 2 100.0%
No observed data after 2014; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

85 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 127 0.8% 7.1% 89.8% 2.4%
2 75 1.3% 4.0% 90.7% 4.0%
3 31 0.0% 0.0% 96.8% 3.2%
4 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
1.3%
2011
2.1%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.