AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Scott T Baderman

Examiner Scott T Baderman appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 26.1%, they average 2.67 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.67
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-3644
Predicted Supervisor
John Cottingham
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-1400
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2110 - Computer Error Control, Reliability, and Control Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
23
Granted Applications
6
Non-Granted Applications
17
Avg OA / Grant
2.67
Last OA Observed
June 2026 (1 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2114 , 2118 , 2144
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 26.1% 2.67
Art Unit 12 53.0% 1.74
Group 208 66.7% 1.69
Tech Center 1,749 54.1% 2.19
USPTO 16,348 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2010 2018 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 1 1 100.0%
No observed data for 2009.
2010 1 1 100.0%
No observed data for 2011-2017.
2018 3 1 33.3%
No observed data for 2019-2024.
2025 7 3 42.9%
2026 11 0 0.0%

6 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 11 0.0% 9.1% 81.8% 9.1%
2 15 6.7% 6.7% 86.7% 0.0%
3 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
4 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2025
8.3%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.