AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Mohammed Shafayet

Examiner Mohammed Shafayet appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 64.4%, they average 2.45 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.45
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
11 years (2016-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-8239
Predicted Supervisor
Kamini Shah
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-2279
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2110 - Computer Error Control, Reliability, and Control Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
292
Granted Applications
188
Non-Granted Applications
104
Avg OA / Grant
2.45
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2116 , 2121
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 64.4% 2.45
Art Unit 34 67.7% 1.81
Group 203 68.7% 1.68
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2016; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2016 3 0 0.0%
2017 21 16 76.2%
2018 26 20 76.9%
2019 29 18 62.1%
2020 35 22 62.9%
2021 20 17 85.0%
2022 31 25 80.6%
2023 34 29 85.3%
2024 31 26 83.9%
2025 40 15 37.5%
2026 22 0 0.0%

188 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 290 0.3% 3.8% 84.8% 10.3%
2 187 0.5% 7.0% 88.2% 4.3%
3 119 0.8% 3.4% 91.6% 4.2%
4 70 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 22 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 4.5%
6 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 11.1%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2016
1.3%
2017
1.7%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
1.1%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.