AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Vasyl Dykyy

Appears inactive Last observed office action: March 2021 (63 months ago).

Examiner Vasyl Dykyy appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 60.0%, they average 1.93 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.93
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
3 years (2019-2021)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2120 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
25
Granted Applications
15
Non-Granted Applications
10
Avg OA / Grant
1.93
Last OA Observed
March 2021 (63 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2122
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 60.0% 1.93
Art Unit 34 40.2% 1.96
Group 316 48.6% 1.98
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019 2020 2021
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2019; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2019 6 3 50.0%
2020 18 11 61.1%
2021 1 1 100.0%
No observed data after 2021; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

15 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 37 0.0% 5.4% 83.8% 10.8%
2 19 5.3% 0.0% 84.2% 10.5%
3 11 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 9.1%
4 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2.6%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.