AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Harold A. Hotelling

Appears inactive Last observed office action: February 2012 (173 months ago).

Examiner Harold A. Hotelling appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 50.6%, they average 2.63 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.63
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
5 years (2008-2012)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2160 - Databases and File Management

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
79
Granted Applications
40
Non-Granted Applications
39
Avg OA / Grant
2.63
Last OA Observed
February 2012 (173 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2164
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 50.6% 2.63
Art Unit 17 59.2% 2.70
Group 196 60.6% 2.52
Tech Center 1,749 54.1% 2.19
USPTO 16,348 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 18 8 44.4%
2009 29 15 51.7%
2010 16 12 75.0%
2011 13 5 38.5%
2012 3 0 0.0%
No observed data after 2012; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

40 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 79 2.5% 19.0% 77.2% 1.3%
2 57 0.0% 14.0% 80.7% 3.5%
3 31 0.0% 16.1% 80.6% 3.2%
4 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 7 0.0% 28.6% 71.4% 0.0%
6 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
2.9%
2010
5.0%
2011
0.0%
2012

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.