AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Michael Scott

Appears inactive Last observed office action: January 2011 (185 months ago).

Examiner Michael Scott appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 47.1%, they average 2.38 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.38
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
3 years (2009-2011)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2170 - Graphical User Interface, Document Processing, Power, and Other

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
17
Granted Applications
8
Non-Granted Applications
9
Avg OA / Grant
2.38
Last OA Observed
January 2011 (185 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2177 , 2178
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 47.1% 2.38
Art Unit 22 53.2% 2.40
Group 187 49.7% 2.74
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009 2010 2011
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2009; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2009 7 2 28.6%
2010 8 4 50.0%
2011 2 2 100.0%
No observed data after 2011; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

8 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 17 0.0% 17.6% 82.4% 0.0%
2 10 10.0% 10.0% 60.0% 20.0%
3 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
4 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2009
6.3%
2010
0.0%
2011

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.