AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Vivian D Ledynh

Appears inactive Last observed office action: August 2024 (22 months ago).

Examiner Vivian D Ledynh appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 67.6%, they average 2.09 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §103, with meaningful §101 activity and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.09
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
2 years (2023-2024)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2180 - Computer Architecture, I/O, Modeling and Simulation

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
34
Granted Applications
23
Non-Granted Applications
11
Avg OA / Grant
2.09
Last OA Observed
August 2024 (22 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2183
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 67.6% 2.09
Art Unit 32 60.0% 2.00
Group 169 56.0% 1.88
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2023 2024
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2023; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2023 19 12 63.2%
2024 15 11 73.3%
No observed data after 2024; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

23 family-cache-validated grants; 1 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 40 27.5% 0.0% 47.5% 25.0%
2 32 34.4% 0.0% 46.9% 18.8%
3 13 30.8% 0.0% 30.8% 38.5%
4 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

50.0%
2022
33.9%
2023
17.4%
2024

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.