AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jasmine Stokely-Collins

Appears inactive Last observed office action: August 2011 (175 months ago).

Examiner Jasmine Stokely-Collins appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 38.9%, they average 2.14 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.14
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
4 years (2008-2011)
Tech Center
2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security
Group
2420 - Cable and Television

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
54
Granted Applications
21
Non-Granted Applications
33
Avg OA / Grant
2.14
Last OA Observed
August 2011 (175 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2423
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 38.9% 2.14
Art Unit 18 50.7% 2.84
Group 129 53.5% 2.61
Tech Center 1,727 60.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 15 5 33.3%
2009 15 5 33.3%
2010 13 9 69.2%
2011 11 2 18.2%
No observed data after 2011; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

21 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 54 1.9% 7.4% 87.0% 0.0%
2 30 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
3 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
4 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
6 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2007
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
4.8%
2010
0.0%
2011

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.