AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Mary Anne Kay

Appears inactive Last observed office action: April 2013 (155 months ago).

Examiner Mary Anne Kay appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 30.8%, they average 3.50 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.50
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
6 years (2008-2013)
Tech Center
2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security
Group
2420 - Cable and Television

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
91
Granted Applications
28
Non-Granted Applications
63
Avg OA / Grant
3.50
Last OA Observed
April 2013 (155 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2426
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 30.8% 3.50
Art Unit 23 50.8% 2.88
Group 129 53.5% 2.61
Tech Center 1,727 60.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 3 0 0.0%
2009 17 4 23.5%
2010 15 1 6.7%
2011 29 14 48.3%
2012 21 7 33.3%
2013 6 2 33.3%
No observed data after 2013; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

28 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 91 0.0% 5.5% 91.2% 0.0%
2 59 11.9% 6.8% 76.3% 3.4%
3 40 2.5% 5.0% 85.0% 7.5%
4 33 0.0% 3.0% 90.9% 6.1%
5 23 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 10 10.0% 10.0% 80.0% 0.0%
7 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 40.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2008
5.5%
2009
1.2%
2010
2.0%
2011
6.9%
2012
16.7%
2013

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.