AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Imhotep Durham

Appears inactive Last observed office action: July 2013 (155 months ago).

Examiner Imhotep Durham appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 59.3%, they average 2.80 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.80
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
5 years (2009-2013)
Tech Center
2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security
Group
2430 - Cryptography and Cybersecurity

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
118
Granted Applications
70
Non-Granted Applications
48
Avg OA / Grant
2.80
Last OA Observed
July 2013 (155 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2434
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 59.3% 2.80
Art Unit 32 67.7% 1.70
Group 225 65.1% 1.99
Tech Center 1,727 60.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2009; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2009 20 5 25.0%
2010 28 16 57.1%
2011 30 18 60.0%
2012 28 20 71.4%
2013 12 11 91.7%
No observed data after 2013; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

70 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 118 2.5% 4.2% 89.8% 2.5%
2 68 0.0% 1.5% 97.1% 1.5%
3 36 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
4 30 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 15 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
23.1%
2013

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.