AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Matthew J. Anderson

Appears inactive Last observed office action: October 2014 (138 months ago).

Examiner Matthew J. Anderson appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 56.0%, they average 2.10 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.10
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
3 years (2012-2014)
Tech Center
2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security
Group
2480 - Recording and Compression

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
75
Granted Applications
42
Non-Granted Applications
33
Avg OA / Grant
2.10
Last OA Observed
October 2014 (138 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2488
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 56.0% 2.10
Art Unit 19 73.4% 1.75
Group 169 62.9% 2.01
Tech Center 1,727 60.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012 2013 2014
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2012; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2012 14 3 21.4%
2013 32 24 75.0%
2014 29 15 51.7%
No observed data after 2014; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

42 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 75 2.7% 17.3% 74.7% 2.7%
2 46 4.3% 10.9% 73.9% 0.0%
3 21 0.0% 4.8% 85.7% 0.0%
4 7 0.0% 14.3% 85.7% 0.0%
5 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

5.3%
2012
2.5%
2013
0.0%
2014

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.