AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner James Conaway

Appears inactive Last observed office action: March 2025 (16 months ago).

Examiner James Conaway appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 75.4%, they average 2.14 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.14
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
18 years (2008-2025)
Tech Center
2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security
Group
2450 - Computer Networks

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
545
Granted Applications
411
Non-Granted Applications
134
Avg OA / Grant
2.14
Last OA Observed
March 2025 (16 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2454
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 75.4% 2.14
Art Unit 42 64.0% 2.14
Group 210 57.7% 2.41
Tech Center 1,748 59.1% 2.14
USPTO 16,348 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 4 2 50.0%
2009 24 17 70.8%
2010 20 8 40.0%
2011 22 15 68.2%
2012 24 14 58.3%
2013 28 18 64.3%
2014 22 12 54.5%
2015 23 15 65.2%
2016 44 29 65.9%
2017 35 28 80.0%
2018 47 38 80.9%
2019 47 36 76.6%
2020 41 37 90.2%
2021 42 39 92.9%
2022 40 37 92.5%
2023 44 39 88.6%
2024 34 24 70.6%
2025 4 3 75.0%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

411 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 543 2.4% 4.2% 86.0% 0.6%
2 312 15.1% 7.7% 69.9% 5.4%
3 182 3.8% 2.7% 86.3% 4.4%
4 102 8.8% 0.0% 82.4% 8.8%
5 60 10.0% 5.0% 76.7% 6.7%
6 37 13.5% 0.0% 78.4% 8.1%
7 19 5.3% 0.0% 89.5% 5.3%
8 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
18.2%
2008
9.1%
2009
10.1%
2010
14.4%
2011
10.5%
2012
7.1%
2013
8.1%
2014
1.3%
2015
8.9%
2016
6.7%
2017
10.2%
2018
2.2%
2019
4.8%
2020
3.1%
2021
1.7%
2022
1.4%
2023
0.0%
2024
20.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.