AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Tania M Pena-Santana

Examiner Tania M Pena-Santana appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 60.9%, they average 2.41 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.41
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
13 years (2014-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-0627
Predicted Supervisor
Nicholas R Taylor
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-3889
Tech Center
2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security
Group
2450 - Computer Networks

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
274
Granted Applications
167
Non-Granted Applications
107
Avg OA / Grant
2.41
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2443 , 2457
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 60.9% 2.41
Art Unit 24 56.3% 2.64
Group 208 59.3% 2.41
Tech Center 1,727 60.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2014; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2014 2 1 50.0%
2015 9 4 44.4%
2016 16 13 81.3%
2017 13 7 53.8%
2018 30 22 73.3%
2019 25 17 68.0%
2020 34 23 67.6%
2021 21 16 76.2%
2022 23 14 60.9%
2023 21 15 71.4%
2024 25 18 72.0%
2025 43 17 39.5%
2026 12 0 0.0%

167 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 274 1.1% 7.3% 81.8% 1.1%
2 168 1.2% 6.0% 91.1% 0.0%
3 111 1.8% 2.7% 91.9% 0.9%
4 68 0.0% 1.5% 97.1% 0.0%
5 40 2.5% 2.5% 95.0% 0.0%
6 27 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
1.4%
2017
1.3%
2018
0.0%
2019
1.6%
2020
2.0%
2021
1.7%
2022
0.0%
2023
3.6%
2024
1.3%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.