AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Sabrina Diaz

Examiner Sabrina Diaz appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 64.1%, they average 1.82 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.82
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
15 years (2012-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-1621
Predicted Supervisor
Ahmad Matar
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-7488
Tech Center
2600 - Communications
Group
2650 - Speech Signal Processing, Linguistics, and Audio Compression

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
569
Granted Applications
365
Non-Granted Applications
204
Avg OA / Grant
1.82
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2652 , 2693
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 64.1% 1.82
Art Unit 15 70.4% 2.03
Group 207 61.5% 1.87
Tech Center 1,729 59.3% 1.88
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2012; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2012 9 4 44.4%
2013 36 22 61.1%
2014 45 30 66.7%
2015 34 21 61.8%
2016 33 23 69.7%
2017 38 31 81.6%
2018 46 39 84.8%
2019 41 32 78.0%
2020 43 40 93.0%
2021 32 22 68.8%
2022 42 32 76.2%
2023 43 26 60.5%
2024 40 29 72.5%
2025 67 14 20.9%
2026 20 0 0.0%

365 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 568 1.4% 3.2% 76.6% 16.9%
2 295 1.0% 3.7% 87.5% 7.1%
3 115 0.0% 1.7% 91.3% 6.1%
4 50 0.0% 0.0% 88.0% 12.0%
5 15 0.0% 6.7% 73.3% 20.0%
6 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 16.7%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
8.2%
2018
2.9%
2019
1.4%
2020
0.0%
2021
1.1%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.