AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner David Ton

Examiner David Ton appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 83.0%, they average 1.38 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.38
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
16 years (2011-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-7839
Predicted Supervisor
Vivian Chin
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-7848
Tech Center
2600 - Communications
Group
2650 - Speech Signal Processing, Linguistics, and Audio Compression

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
652
Granted Applications
541
Non-Granted Applications
111
Avg OA / Grant
1.38
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2614 , 2654 , 2695
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 83.0% 1.38
Art Unit 22 50.7% 1.87
Group 207 61.5% 1.87
Tech Center 1,729 59.3% 1.88
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2011; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2011 21 13 61.9%
2012 41 32 78.0%
2013 41 33 80.5%
2014 54 44 81.5%
2015 46 38 82.6%
2016 70 56 80.0%
2017 56 48 85.7%
2018 43 36 83.7%
2019 47 44 93.6%
2020 46 46 100.0%
2021 37 32 86.5%
2022 41 38 92.7%
2023 34 32 94.1%
2024 36 34 94.4%
2025 32 15 46.9%
2026 7 0 0.0%

541 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 652 5.2% 12.4% 52.8% 16.6%
2 153 4.6% 7.2% 76.5% 7.2%
3 63 3.2% 6.3% 76.2% 7.9%
4 19 0.0% 21.1% 63.2% 5.3%
5 6 0.0% 50.0% 33.3% 0.0%
6 4 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 0.0%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2010
1.6%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
12.5%
2015
6.0%
2016
10.5%
2017
14.8%
2018
3.4%
2019
5.1%
2020
2.3%
2021
2.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
4.5%
2024
8.8%
2025
14.3%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.